“Fe” and “Wo” and the astonishing difference they make.

There’s male and there’s female. There man and there’s woman. Then there is women’s rights and the female movement. At this point the parallelism comes to an abrupt halt. There is no male movement or a particular push for men’s right. Men just find themselves in the human rights category. They’ve got nothing exclusive of their own.

Let’s carry on. There’s Drake and there’s Madonna. A 28 year old young man and a matured 56 year old woman.

Let’s establish one or two things before we proceed. Assuming the entire Coachella event was not staged, then Drake was kissed by Madonna without his consent in a public setting.  This kind of incident is generally considered to be sexual harassment or abuse. That’s where it’s categorized. But, since the roles were reversed, It wasn’t the man kissing the woman but rather the woman kissing the man, then apparently that is OK. There is no problem with that. This has been dubbed by the media as every boy’s dream. It reminds me of the Jay-Z-Solange incident. If the roles were reversed it would have been a whole different scenario.

Imagine Mr.Washington going on stage and doing this to Selena. The media will be like” Whaaaat the!!!!???” But reverse the roles and people will be like: “Ooohh!! Ok.”

Women have the women’s rights manual to refer to when something of this sort happens but men, what do they have? They have nothing.


A woman (female) can sue a man for virtually anything that concerns her body. Take away the “wo” or the “fe” and there is nothing to sue. The man is told to “suck it up! It’s every boy’s dream and here you are complaining!”

0 comments